Trying to see how knowledges are united

When solving one problem does not solve another, we try to see what is more fundamental problem shared between them. Eventually we reach a point where we only need to solve one problem that is for everything. If you have such a “united” problem, what we need is the “united knowledge” to give an answer to how the problem can be solved.

While this subject seems to be a question only for philosophers, it demands not only conceptual views but also material-based understanding. That is when biology comes into play, probing how multiple things come together to have collective functionality at as ultimate degree as possible.

---

Thoughts & Actions

• Grad_research_notes

• Reviewing and extending thoughts from “A comparative perspective on animal cultures” by Masashi TANAKA

• Demonstrating “bounded habitats of knowledge” using sudoku problem measured by N2pc signal.

• YuYu’s Lab Wiki for Consilience

• The levels of serotonin in the brain influence the ability to compromise political differences?

• How do humans compromise in politics?

• The problem of compromise in Japan: The Unbalanced Compromise in Japanese Electoral System

---

遺産

— Until 2/14/2025 —

Main research question

How do people with different backgrounds collaborate to reach a shared goal?

Sub inquiries

• How can we untangled social issues using biology?
• What are required for integration of hummanities and sciences?
• What is a “nice” way to create a division of labour to solve problems?
• In humans, what kinds of heuristics / methods are utilised to solve a common problem?
• What are needed to apply one system to another?
• What makes the division of cognitive labour successful?
• What do we need to substantiate the division of cognitive labour?